| Author
|
Thread |
  |
|
chichi
Music Stealer
Joined: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 594
|
woman ordered to pay 1.8 million for illegal downloads
quote:
A US jury has ordered a 32-year-old woman to pay $US1.92 million ($A2.4 million) in damages for illegally downloading 24 songs in a high-profile digital piracy case.
Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a single mother of four from the US state of Minnesota, was found liable for using the Kazaa peer-to-peer file-sharing network to download the songs over the internet.
The jury took just under five hours on Thursday to reach its verdict.
It ordered Thomas-Rasset to pay 1.92 million dollars - or $US80,000 ($A100,000) per song - to six record companies: Capitol Records, Sony BMG Music, Arista Records, Interscope Records, Warner Bros. Records and UMG Recordings.
Thomas-Rasset had been convicted previously, in October 2007, and ordered to pay $US220,000 ($A275,000) in damages but the judge who presided over that trial threw out the verdict calling it "wholly disproportionate" and "oppressive."
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and major music labels have brought suit against thousands of people for illegally downloading and sharing music, with most agreeing to settlements of between 3,000 and 5,000 dollars.
Thomas-Rasset was the first among those being sued to refuse a settlement and instead took the case to court.
In December, the RIAA said it will stop suing people who download music illegally and focus instead on getting internet Service Providers to take action.
The move away from litigation represented a major shift in strategy for the music industry group, which had filed lawsuits against some 35,000 people for online music piracy since 2003.
What do you all think about this? I think the major difference between us and that woman is that she downloaded it from a p2p program, but we're downloading from separate links from upload services. do you think that we are vulnerable too?
It makes me feel scared!!! How do companies tell if we have downloaded things illegally? I mean if we download things from rapidshare with file with a random name like 003uy7584i then can they track us???
|
Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:57 pm |
|
|
|
|
chichi
Music Stealer
Joined: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 594
|
^^ well thats the thing, most people dont think that downloading music is that much of a big deal because it is a thing 'incorporeal', it is not a tangible thing. so when you "steal" it, it does not seem so bad, because you can't see the impact it has on the person you are stealing it from. i guess its analagous to going into a cd store and stealing a cd....so it kinda really is real crime.
|
|
Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:40 pm |
|
|
faelwerneck19
RIAA Wanted
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 4593
Location: Brazil |
I think it's OK to punish people for uploading music, but not for downloading it... I know this may seem hypocritical of me but as long as it's available all over the Internet there's nothing wrong about downloading the songs you're searching for, right? If you're looking for a CD at a store, no matter if it's cheap or expensive, and then someone offers you that same CD for free you won't think twice before accepting it, will you?
And by punishing people for uploading music, I mean only in special cases like the constant early leaks because as long as the CD has already been released and I already have mine, I can do with it whatever I want! But what really damages albums/singles sales are the early leaks, so they are the real record companies "enemies", not people who download them...
|
|
Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:14 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
faelwerneck19
RIAA Wanted
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 4593
Location: Brazil |
quote:
Originally posted by WalkThisWay
The amount they have fined her is rediculous, she won't ever be able to pay it however long she lives. If they're gonna fine her, it should be a few hundred dollars, max.
And yeah, it's rediculous, it's not harming anyone, just an excuse for record companies to make more money!
Completely agree! If they are to punish people by making them pay for the songs they have downloaded, the reasonable price to pay for them would be the same price the songs are costing on iTunes, for example... There's no way someone who download music illegally will be able to pay more than a million dollars for 24 songs! Stupid question: can she go to jail if she refuses/isn't able to pay?
|
|
Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:53 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Music_City
Newbieee
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 96
|
It is a real crime.
Stealing Music Online Is The Same Thing As Stealing A CD from a store.
|
|
Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:24 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
[/URL]
As if they're gonna track us all down XD
